MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292187920 · doi:10.1063/5.0085933

Fractional modeling of urban growth with memory effects

2022· article· en· W4292187920 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chun Yun Kee, Cherq Chua, Muhammad Zubair, L. K. Ang

Bibliographic record

VenueChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval Research GlobalSingapore University of Technology and Design
KeywordsSustainable growth ratePopulationScalingEmpirical researchPopulation growthEconometricsChinaElectricityComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationEconomicsStatisticsEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The previous urban growth model by L. M. A. Bettencourt was developed under the framework of a constant β scaling law in an ordinary differential equation based model assuming instantaneous dynamic growth. In this paper, we improve the model by considering the memory effects based on fractional calculus. By testing this new fractional model to different urban attributes related to sustainable growth, such as congestion delay, water supply, and electricity consumption for selected countries (the USA, China, Singapore, Canada, Switzerland, New Zealand), this new model may provide better agreement to the annual population growth by numerically finding the optimal fractional parameter for different attributes. Based on the theoretical time-independent scaling of β = 5 / 6 (sub-linear) and β = 7 / 6 (super-linear), we also analyze the population growth of 42 countries from 1960 to 2018. Furthermore, time-dependent scaling law extracted from empirical data is shown to provide further improvements. With better agreement between this proposed fractional model and the collected empirical population growth data, useful parameters can be estimated. For example, the maintenance cost and additional cost related to the sustainable growth (for a given city's attribute) can be quantitatively determined for the informed decision and urban planning for the sustainable growth of cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear ScienceSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207