MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292198324 · doi:10.1111/tog.12831

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis

2022· article· en· W4292198324 on OpenAlexaff
Junaid Rafi, P. D. M. Pathiraja, Emily Gelson, Richard Brown, Djavid Alleemudder

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometriosisMedicineObstetricsMiscarriagePregnancyCaesarean sectionGynecologyIntrauterine growth restrictionFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key content Endometriosis in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage, pre‐eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage, caesarean section, placenta praevia, fetal growth restriction, prematurity and adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with mild disease are considered as having ‘low‐risk endometriosis’ (LRE) and can expect a normal pregnancy and labour. The ‘high‐risk endometriosis’ (HRE) group may require additional antenatal and intrapartum specialist care. Learning objectives To understand the pathophysiologic basis of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with endometriosis. To understand the obstetric outcomes in relation to the severity and staging of endometriosis. To appreciate the risk of spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) associated with endometriosis in pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Obstetrician & GynaecologistSame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207