MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292209089 · doi:10.35138/gp.v3i2.354

Perkiraan Waktu Dalam Penyelesaian Proyek Kolam Retensi Sirnaraga Menggunakan Penerapan EVA (Earned Value Analysis)

2021· article· id· W4292209089 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOPLANART · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kolam Retensi adalah suatu kolam yang dapat menampung atau meresap air sementara yang terdapat didalamnya, tentunya dalam pelaksanaan kontruksinya harus direncanakan penjadwalan yang matang. Metode “Nilai Hasil” (Earned Value) merupakan suatu metode pengendalian yang digunakan untuk mengendalikan biaya dan jadwal proyek secara terpadu. Metode ini dapat memberikan informasi dalam status kinerja proyek pada suatu periode pelaporan dan memberikan informasi prediksi biaya yang dibutuhkan serta waktu untuk menyelesaikan seluruh pekerjaan berdasarkan indikator kinerja saat pelaporan. Dalam penelitian ini dicoba menhitung perkiraan waktu dalam penyelesaian proyek dengan menggunakan metode tersebut agar diharapkan mendapatkan penjadwalan konstruksi yang efisien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it