MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292209137 · doi:10.35138/gp.v3i2.355

POTENSI EMISI GRK DARI SEKTOR PETERNAKAN DESA CIKALONG,KAB. BANDUNG BARAT TAHUN 2016-2021

2021· article· id· W4292209137 on OpenAlexaff
Tati Artiningrum, Citra Artifiani Havianto

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOPLANART · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicWetland Management and Conservation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesForestryGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salah satu sektor yang berkontribusi dalam peningkatan pemanasan global adalah limbah peternakan yang diantaranya berasal dari kotoran hewan. Sumbangan emsinya diantaranya berasal dari gas metana (CH4), dinitrogen oksida (N2O), karbon dioksida (CO2), dan amonia yang dapat menimbulkan hujan asam. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui sumbangan emisi Gas Rumah Kaca (GRK) dari sektor peternakan tahun 2016 sampai 2021 pada tempat penampungan hewan berupa penggemukan sapi perah dan sapi potong di Desa Kecamatan, Cikalong Wetan, Kabupaten Barat. Penelitian ini mengunakan metodenya survei lapangan dan study literatur untuk memperoleh data primer serta data sekunder berupa populasi ternak dan pengelolaan limbahnya. Data diolah dengan mengunakan metoda Tier I dari IPCC. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa Tahun 2016 Desa Cikalong memberikan sumbangan emisi sebesar 2610,55 ton CO2- eq/tahun meningkat hingga 3632,16 ton CO2-eq/tahun pada Tahun 2019 yang didominasi oleh CH4 dari fermentasi enterik

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGEOPLANARTSame topicWetland Management and ConservationFrench-language works237,207