MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292262009 · doi:10.1111/ijfs.16027

Pesticides dissipation in crackers and pan bread

2022· article· en· W4292262009 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Gélinas, Carole McKinnon, Fleur Gagnon, Nathalie Rémillard, Hassan Sabik

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint HyacintheAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeavening agentPesticideFood scienceChemistryFungicideFermentationAgronomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Pesticides might cause health problems and must be thoroughly controlled in food. The aim of this study was to determine, on dry basis, the dissipation of active material in sixteen pesticides for wheat production (eleven fungicides; two herbicides; three insecticides) after heating in water, flat dough (crackers) and leavened dough (pan bread); the effect of dough alkalinity was also checked. Compared to water, dough protected pesticides from heat. Malathion, an insecticide, was easily dissipated by heat but most pesticides, especially fungicides, were very stable to dough fermentation and bread baking. With a few exceptions, similar trends were seen in neutral and alkaline crackers. We conclude that it is unlikely that baking would dissipate much pesticides residues, especially fungicides, in flat and leavened dough for crackers and pan bread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Food Science & TechnologySame topicPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyFrench-language works237,207