Towards the development of a diagnostic test for autism spectrum disorder: Big data meets metabolomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined as a neurodevelopmental disorder which results in impairments in social communications and interactions as well as repetitive behaviors. Despite current estimates showing that approximately 2.2% of children are affected in the United States, relatively little about ASD pathophysiology is known in part due to the highly heterogenous presentation of the disorder. Given the limited knowledge into the biological mechanisms governing its etiology, the diagnosis of ASD is performed exclusively based on an individual's behavior assessed by a clinician through psychometric tools. Although there is no readily available biochemical test for ASD diagnosis, multivariate statistical methods show considerable potential for effectively leveraging multiple biochemical measurements for classification and characterization purposes. In this work, markers associated with the folate dependent one-carbon metabolism and transulfuration (FOCM/TS) pathways analyzed via both Fisher Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machine showed strong capability to distinguish between ASD and TD cohorts. Furthermore, using Kernel Partial Least Squares regression it was possible to assess some degree of behavioral severity from metabolomic data. While the results presented need to be replicated in independent future studies, they represent a promising avenue for uncovering clinically relevant ASD biomarkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.080 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".