Direct-ink writing and compression behavior by in situ micro-tomography of architectured 316L scaffolds with a two-scale porosity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metallic scaffolds with 3D macroporous architecture were produced by direct-ink writing, an additive manufacturing process, which consists in: (i) ink formulation (ii) 3D layerwise extrusion (iii) debinding and sintering. An easy-handling and CMR-free metallic ink composed of aqueous gel and stainless steel powder was optimized to allow 3D extrusion when keeping stiffness and viscosity for design adequation. Evolution upon sintering under vacuum, resulting in a second-scale micronic porosity, was followed by microscopy and 3D X-ray tomography. The ductile behavior was assessed by in situ compressive test under X-Ray tomography, showing a predominant role of macropores compared to micropores in the filaments. This design method with the same hydrogel can be applied to generate other architectured structures of sinterable alloys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".