MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low Voltage Network State Estimation: RSE's Experimental Validation

2022· article· en· W4292348386 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel Pendieu Kwaye, Riccardo Lazzari

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityPhasorSmart gridContext (archaeology)Units of measurementPhasor measurement unitComputer scienceElectric power systemDistributed generationState (computer science)EstimationControl theory (sociology)State variableReliability engineeringPower (physics)Control engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing spread of distributed energy resources in distribution network causes variable power flows that must be managed to maintain a stable system operation. In this context, the estimation of the network states is fundamental for online monitoring and control. Efficient and accurate state estimation is essential for the optimal management of the future smart grid. The development of low-cost phasor measurement units (PMUs) designed for distribution network can improve the system observability. However, it is unrealistic to install PMUs PMU on all network nodes due to the high cost. This leads to determine optimal PMU placement to maintain system observability with a minimal number of measurements. Nevertheless, only few studies demonstrate the effect of different PMU placement in a real environment. This paper describes the development of a test bed for the evaluation of the performances of PMU based state estimation and the results of tests performed to assess the state estimation considering different PMU placement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe)Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207