MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Low Voltage Network State Estimation: RSE's Experimental Validation

2022· article· en· W4292348386 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel Pendieu Kwaye, Riccardo Lazzari

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityPhasorSmart gridContext (archaeology)Units of measurementPhasor measurement unitComputer scienceElectric power systemDistributed generationState (computer science)EstimationControl theory (sociology)State variableReliability engineeringPower (physics)Control engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing spread of distributed energy resources in distribution network causes variable power flows that must be managed to maintain a stable system operation. In this context, the estimation of the network states is fundamental for online monitoring and control. Efficient and accurate state estimation is essential for the optimal management of the future smart grid. The development of low-cost phasor measurement units (PMUs) designed for distribution network can improve the system observability. However, it is unrealistic to install PMUs PMU on all network nodes due to the high cost. This leads to determine optimal PMU placement to maintain system observability with a minimal number of measurements. Nevertheless, only few studies demonstrate the effect of different PMU placement in a real environment. This paper describes the development of a test bed for the evaluation of the performances of PMU based state estimation and the results of tests performed to assess the state estimation considering different PMU placement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe)Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207