MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292348769 · doi:10.20360/langandlit29580

Défis et facilitateurs lors de l’implantation de pratiques d’intervention naturalistes pour soutenir le développement de la littératie en milieu de garde

2022· article· fr· W4292348769 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Colombe Lemire, Carmen Dionne, Julie Myre-Bisaillon

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage and Literacy · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les pratiques d’intervention naturalistes dont l’activity-based intervention (ABI) utilisent le jeu et les activités quotidiennes pour soutenir le développement d’habiletés chez les jeunes enfants. Cet article documente les défis et facilitateurs rencontrés par quatre éducatrices en milieu de garde ayant reçu de la formation et de l’accompagnement pour implanter l’ABI en soutien au développement d’habiletés en littératie. Les principaux défis relèvent du manque de temps et de la gestion des défis socio-émotionnels. Dans les facilitateurs se retrouvent les adaptations de l’environnement et les intérêts des enfants. Cet article met en lumière, l’importance d’offrir du matériel en littératie diversifié et accessible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage and LiteracySame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207