Alteration at the Base of the Siccar Point Unconformity and Further Evidence for an Alkaline Provenance at Gale Crater: Exploration of the Mount Sharp Group, Greenheugh Pediment Cap Rock Contact With APXS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chemical data acquired by Curiosity 's Alpha Particle X‐ray Spectrometer during examination of the contact between the upper Mount Sharp group and overlying Stimson formation sandstones at the Greenheugh pediment reveal compositional similarities to rocks encountered earlier in the mission. Mount Sharp group strata encountered below the Basal Siccar Point group unconformity at the base and top of the section, separated by >300 m in elevation, have distinct and related compositions. This indicates enhanced post‐depositional fluid flow and alteration focused along this contact. Sandstone targets exposed immediately above the unconformity have basaltic compositions consistent with previously encountered eolian Stimson formation sandstones, except at the contact, where they show the addition of S. Resistant sandstone outcrops above the contact have higher K, Mn, and Na and lower Ni concentrations that primarily reflect changes in provenance. They are compositionally related to cap rock float blocks encountered as Curiosity climbed through the Mount Sharp group, and Bradbury group sandstone outcrops. The higher K, pediment sandstones are interpreted to have a similar provenance to some Bradbury group sandstones, further evidence for widespread, alkaline source rock within and/or in the vicinity of Gale crater. The Bradbury and Siccar Point groups may both be younger than the Mount Sharp group. Alternatively, an alkaline source area in and around Gale crater has been eroded by both water and wind at different times (both before and after deposition of the Mount Sharp group), during the evolution of the crater and its infill.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".