Walking exercise alters pedunculopontine nucleus connectivity in Parkinson’s disease in a dose-dependent manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Gait disturbances are critical motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). The mechanisms of gait impairment in PD are not entirely understood but likely involve changes in the Pedunculopontine Nucleus (PPN), a critical locomotion center, and its associated connections. Exercise is universally accepted as helpful in PD, but the extent and intensity of exercise required for plastic changes are unclear. Methods: Twenty-seven PD subjects participated in a 3-month gait training intervention. Clinical assessments and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were performed at baseline and 3 months after exercise. Functional connectivity of PPN was assessed by combining the methods of partial least squares, conditional dependence and partial correlation. In addition, paired t-tests were used to examine the effect of exercise on PPN functional connectivity and clinical measures, and Pearson's correlation was used to assess the association between altered PPN functional connectivity and clinical measures. Results: Exercise significantly improved Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III). A significant increase in right PPN functional connectivity was observed after exercise, which did not correlate with motor improvement. However, the decrease in left PPN functional connectivity significantly correlated with the improvement in UPDRS-III and was linearly related to both number of walks and the duration of walks. In addition, exercise induced a significant increase in the laterality of PPN connectivity strength, which correlated with motor improvement. Conclusion: PPN functional connectivity is modifiable by walking exercise in both a dose-independent (right PPN and laterality of PPN connectivity strength) and dose-dependent (left PPN) manner. The PPN may contribute to pathological and compensatory processes in PD gait control. The observed gait improvement by walking exercise is most likely due to the reversal of the maladaptive compensatory mechanism. Altered PPN functional connectivity can be a marker for exercise-induced motor improvement in PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".