MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292411714 · doi:10.1080/02739615.2022.2108812

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Utilization and forgoing of Health Care among Children: A Nationally Representative Study in the United States

2022· article· en· W4292411714 on OpenAlexaff
Héctor E. Alcalá, Amanda E. Ng, Nicholas Tkach, Zoha Salam

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren s Health Care · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careAdverse Childhood ExperiencesMedicineEnvironmental healthNational Health Interview SurveyLogistic regressionOddsMental healthOccupational safety and healthFamily medicineGerontologyPsychiatryPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little is known about the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on delaying health care. Using data from the 2016–2017 National Survey of Children’s Health (n = 64,103), we examined the association between ACEs and forgoing: medical care, hearing care, vision care, mental health care, and use of health services. In logistic regression models, cumulative ACEs were associated with increases in forgoing most types of care. ACEs were associated with increased odds of using emergency department services and preventative health care. Efforts must be undertaken to reduce delays in care among children with a history of ACEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildren s Health CareSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207