Hydrogen and dark oxygen drive microbial productivity in diverse groundwater ecosystems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Groundwater ecosystems are globally wide-spread yet still poorly understood. We investigated the age, aqueous geochemistry, and microbiology of 138 groundwater samples from 87 monitoring wells (<250m depth) located in 14 aquifers in the Canadian Prairie. Geochemistry and microbial ecology were tightly linked revealing large-scale aerobic and anaerobic hydrogen, methane, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling carried out by diverse microbial communities. Older groundwaters contained on average more cells (up to 1.4×10 7 /mL) than younger ground-waters. Organic carbon-rich strata featured some of the highest abundances, challenging current estimates of global groundwater population sizes. Substantial concentrations of dissolved oxygen (n=57; 0.52±0.12 mg/L [mean±SE]; 0.39 mg/L [median]) in older groundwaters could support aerobic lifestyles in subsurface ecosystems at an unprecedented scale. Metagenomics, oxygen isotope analyses and mixing models indicated that microbial “dark oxygen” contributed to the dissolved oxygen pool in subsurface ecosystems commonly assumed to be anoxic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".