MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292450728 · doi:10.1117/12.2629094

GPI 2.0: performance evaluation of the wavefront sensor’s EMCCD

2022· article· en· W4292450728 on OpenAlexaff
Clarissa R. Do Ó, Saavidra Perera, Jérôme Maîre, Jayke S. Nguyen, Daniel Levinstein, Quinn Konopacky, Jeffrey Chilcote, Joeleff Fitzsimmons, Randall Hamper, Dan Kerley, Bruce Macintosh, Christian Marois, Fredrik T. Rantakyrö, Dmitry Savransky, Jean‐Pierre Véran, Guido Agapito, S. Mark Ammons, Marco Bonaglia, Marc-André Boucher, Jennifer Dunn, Simone Esposito, Guillaume Filion, Jean-Thomas Landry, Olivier Lardière, Duan Li, Alex Madurowicz, Dillon Peng, Lisa Poyneer, Eckhart Spalding

Bibliographic record

VenueAdaptive Optics Systems VIII · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaU.S. Department of EnergyMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWavefrontAdaptive opticsWavefront sensorComputer scienceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) is a high contrast imaging instrument that aims to detect and characterize extrasolar planets. GPI is being upgraded to GPI 2.0, with several subsystems receiving a re-design to improve the instrument\'s contrast. To enable observations on fainter targets and increase stability on brighter ones, one of the upgrades is to the adaptive optics system. The current Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (WFS) is being replaced by a pyramid WFS with an low-noise electron-multiplying CCD (EMCCD). EMCCDs are detectors capable of counting single photon events at high speed and high sensitivity. In this work, we characterize the performance of the HNu 240 EMCCD from Nuvu Cameras, which was custom-built for GPI 2.0. The HNu 240 EMCCD\'s characteristics make it well suited for extreme AO: it has low dark current (

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdaptive Optics Systems VIIISame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207