MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292470439 · doi:10.5539/ijel.v12n5p89

A Battle Against One’s Soul: An Analysis of Lady Macbeth’s Functions as the Other Self to Macbeth

2022· article· en· W4292470439 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Min Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of English Linguistics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleAlienationSociologyAestheticsPsychologyArtLawPolitical scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The play Macbeth is one of William Shakespeare’s most well-known tragedies. This research is intended to analyze the functions of Lady Macbeth as the other self to Macbeth. She is not only the motivator of Macbeth’s self-assertion, but also the silent bearer of Macbeth’s burden of conscience and the reflector of Macbeth’s self-alienation. Undoubtedly, Lady Macbeth plays a crucial role in the tragic end of Macbeth since it’s she that improvises Macbeth to commit crime. Her incitements and actions, nevertheless, are only the overt show of Macbeth’s inward eagerness to assert himself as a brave man. Lady Macbeth, furthermore, conscientiously suffers the burden of Macbeth’s sense of guilt later on. And her alienation from Macbeth indicates the latter’s self-alienation, who has gone the wrong direction but can no longer find the way back. Their relationship shows the process of Macbeth’s self-definition and vividly depicts the ambivalence of Macbeth’s tortured self.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of English LinguisticsSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207