Towards globally relevant, small-footprint dewatering solutions: Optimal conditioner dose for highly variable blackwater from non-sewered sanitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globally, the sanitation needs of three billion people are met by non-sewered sanitation. Small-footprint treatment technologies are needed that are appropriate for dense urban areas. Blackwater (BW) (or fecal sludge), contains more than 95% liquid, and dewatering it without conditioning requires large footprints. Chemically-enhanced dewatering with conditioners is a promising option to increase dewatering performance and reduce required footprints. However, before implementation of this solution there is a need for increased knowledge on selection and dosing of conditioners. This study evaluated bio-based and synthetic conditioners (chitosan, tannin-, and starch-based, synthetic with and without poly-acrylamide) with 14 types of BW from five countries. The supernatant after settling with jar-tests was analyzed to quantify optimal dose and dewatering performance. The reduction of total chemical oxygen demand (COD) was >55%, achieved by removal of particulate constituents with mainly soluble COD remaining in the supernatant. A reduction in particulate COD could lead to increased efficiency of soluble COD in supernatant treatment. Bio-based conditioners are as effective as synthetic conditioners, and when performance was variable, it was due to differing properties of TSS, TS, EC and pH. Optimal conditioner dose for synthetic conditioners and chitosan could be predicted using concentrations of total solids (TS) (R2 > 0.7), whereas optimal dose for starch- and tannin-based conditioners could be predicted with electrical conductivity (EC) (R2 > 0.8), and colloid titration (R2 > 0.8). In addition, real-time optical TSS and EC sensors could accurately predict chitosan dose for fresh BW treated at source (R2 = 0.97, R2 = 0.95). This study validates that use of conditioners for dewatering with highly variable BW can be implemented with real-time measurements for optimal dose, in globally relevant implementations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".