MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4292485616 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18368-5

Spatial and temporal stability in the genetic structure of a marine crab despite a biogeographic break

2022· article· en· W4292485616 on OpenAlexaff
David Véliz, Noemí Rojas‐Hernández, Caren Vega‐Retter, Camila Zaviezo, Ignacio Garrido, Luis Miguel Pardo

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas PrioritariasFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoAgencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
KeywordsBiological dispersalGene flowEcologyPopulationBiologyGenetic structurePopulation geneticsBenthic zoneGeographyGenetic variationGeneGeneticsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elucidating the processes responsible for maintaining the population connectivity of marine benthic species mediated by larval dispersal remains a fundamental question in marine ecology and fishery management. Understanding these processes becomes particularly important in areas with a biogeographic break and unidirectional water movement along the sides of the break. Based on variability at 4209 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 234 individuals, we determine the genetic structure, temporal genetic stability, and gene flow among populations of the commercially important mola rock crab Metacarcinus edwardsii in a system in southern Chile with a biogeographic break at latitude 42°S. Specimens were collected at eight sites within its geographic distribution, with collection at four of these sites was performed twice. Using population genetic approaches, we found no evidence of geographic or temporal population differentiation. Similarly, we found no evidence of an effect on gene flow of the biogeographic break caused by the the West Wind Drift Current. Moreover, migration analyses supported gene flow among all sites but at different rates for different pairs of sites. Overall, our findings indicate that M. edwardsii comprises a single large population with high levels of gene flow among sites separated by over 1700 km and demonstrate temporal stability in its genetic structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→