Characterizing the Flow Regime in Brook Trout Incubation Habitats and Implications for Management in a Hydro-Regulated River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The operation of dams, diversions, and power generation facilities unavoidably influence the ecological function of rivers. We evaluated vertical and horizontal hydraulic gradients and subsequent water temperature changes in the hyporheic zone of a spawning area for Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis in a managed Lake Superior tributary in Ontario, then conducted a laboratory-based experiment to show the impact of cold shock during incubation on the timing of larval emergence and survival. Upwelling groundwater was observed at the spawning area during the monitoring period (October 28, 2016, to January 11, 2017); hyporheic water temperatures remained above 3.7°C, whereas ambient river temperature above the substrate fell to 1.5°C until water was released from the upstream control dam. After the release event, water level increased by 0.9 m over the spawning area, and within 24 h, vertical and horizontal flow gradients were reversed in the hyporheic zone; downwelling conditions were observed for 30 h between surface and hyporheic water 1.8 m below substrate, and hyporheic water temperature decreased in unison. Hyporheic temperatures at shallow inshore sites fell below 1°C for more than 53 h. In the laboratory, applying a worst-case scenario of dam-induced cold shock on Brook Trout redds using historic monitoring records (i.e., <1.0°C for 40 h), we found no appreciable effect on survival and development timing of incubating Brook Trout eggs compared with a control group. Survival from fertilization to hatching was high for both treatment and control groups (>90%) and lower from fertilization to emergence (55%). Overall, our results suggest that standard winter operating procedures on a Lake Superior tributary had little impact on Brook Trout egg survival and development time to hatching and emergence; however, our findings also suggest that staged winter discharges would lessen the reversal of flow in the hyporheic zone and the magnitude of temperature changes experienced at Brook Trout redds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".