MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292566172 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.21.504695

Extant hybrids of RNA viruses and viroid-like elements

2022· preprint· en· W4292566172 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marco Forgia, Beatriz Navarro, Stefania Daghino, Amelia Cervera, Andreas Gisel, Silvia Perotto, Dilzara N. Aghayeva, Mary F. Akinyuwa, Emanuela Gobbi, Ivan N. Zheludev, R. C. Edgar, Rayan Chikhi, Massimo Turina, Artem Babaian, Francesco Di Serio, Marcos de la Peña

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersErasmus+University of British ColumbiaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEuropean Commission
KeywordsViroidRNABiologyVirologyRibozymeRNA silencingRNA-dependent RNA polymeraseRNA polymeraseGeneticsGenomeGeneRNA interference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Earth’s life may have originated as self-replicating RNA. Some of the simplest current RNA replicators are RNA viruses, defined by linear RNA genomes encoding an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), and subviral agents with single-stranded, circular RNA genomes, such as viroids encoding paired self-cleaving ribozymes. Amongst a massive expansion of candidate viroid and viroid-like elements, we report that fungal pathogens, ambiviruses, are viroid-like elements which undergo rolling circle replication and encode their own viral RdRP, thus they are a distinct hybrid infectious agent. These findings point to a deep evolutionary history between modern RNA viruses and sub-viral elements and offer new perspectives on the evolution of primordial infectious agents, and RNA life. One-Sentence Summary Novel infectious agents resembling self-cleaving viroid-like RNAs whilst encoding a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207