MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292566250 · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2022.4.005

Dissolution of companies and partnerships: causes and effects in accordance with the legal environment in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2022· article· en· W4292566250 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bader Nasser Adosari

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Science Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParent companyBusinessLimited liabilityLimited companyPlaintiffLiabilityLegal personSubsidiaryRentingLawWork (physics)MarketingFinanceMultinational corporationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term dissolution of the company refers to the expiration of the legal relationship between the partners, in different words the dissolution of the moral character of the company. Basically, commercial companies are established for the purpose of achieving the objective and the profits which are impossible for each partner to achieve alone, so partners work hardly to keep this company standing and ongoing practicing its commercial activities.in this paper focuses on the most prominent reasons for the expiry of commercial companies, whether partnerships or corporations, whether by the expiration of the definite-period of the company on the Saudi System for Companies. Also each company represents a person with a moral character who is entitled to legal capacity which enables it to acquire the rights and bear the liabilities the same as the natural person. The company is entitled to practice its activities with the assigned purposes of establishment and to conclude all legal acts including selling, purchasing, renting, leasing and whatsoever. Gaining the moral character capacity makes the company entitled to be plaintiff or defendant in case of disputes with other parties. Thus, in this scientific paper shall discuss the independent reasons which are entitled by the companies in its capacity as moral persons, moreover it can go beyond to other factors as well as being dependent by liability against other companies liabilities, and having a deputy to represent this company. It is also entitled to have the nationality of the country where its management office is located.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement Science LettersSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207