MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292582396 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17983-6

Solubility of gaseous hydrocarbons in ionic liquids using equations of state and machine learning approaches

2022· article· en· W4292582396 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Nakhaei-Kohani, Saeid Atashrouz, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Ali Bostani, Abdolhossein Hemmati‐Sarapardeh, Ahmad Mohaddespour

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityMean squared errorIonic liquidSupport vector machineEquation of stateExtreme learning machineMars Exploration ProgramDeep belief networkCoefficient of determinationChemistryThermodynamicsBiological systemComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkMachine learningOrganic chemistryMathematicsStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as suitable options for gas storage applications over the past decade. Consequently, accurate prediction of gas solubility in ILs is crucial for their application in the industry. In this study, four intelligent techniques including Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Deep Belief Network (DBN), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), and Boosting-Support Vector Regression (Boost-SVR) have been proposed to estimate the solubility of some gaseous hydrocarbons in ILs based on two distinct methods. In the first method, the thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons and ILs were used as input parameters, while in the second method, the chemical structure of ILs and hydrocarbons along with temperature and pressure were used. The results show that in the first method, the DBN model with root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.0054 and 0.9961, respectively, and in the second method, the DBN model with RMSE and R2 values of 0.0065 and 0.9943, respectively, have the most accurate predictions. To evaluate the performance of intelligent models, the obtained results were compared with previous studies and equations of the state including Peng–Robinson (PR), Soave–Redlich–Kwong (SRK), Redlich–Kwong (RK), and Zudkevitch–Joffe (ZJ). Findings show that intelligent models have high accuracy compared to equations of state. Finally, the investigation of the effect of different factors such as alkyl chain length, type of anion and cation, pressure, temperature, and type of hydrocarbon on the solubility of gaseous hydrocarbons in ILs shows that pressure and temperature have a direct and inverse effect on increasing the solubility of gaseous hydrocarbons in ILs, respectively. Also, the evaluation of the effect of hydrocarbon type shows that increasing the molecular weight of hydrocarbons increases the solubility of gaseous hydrocarbons in ILs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207