MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292582544 · doi:10.24018/ejece.2022.6.4.455

IoT-Based Real-Time Aquaculture Health Monitoring System

2022· article· en· W4292582544 on OpenAlexaff
Adnan Sarwar, M. Tariq Iqbal

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquacultureMQTTMicrocontrollerInternet of ThingsComputer scienceInterface (matter)Work (physics)ArduinoBusinessEnvironmental scienceEmbedded systemFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Operating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquaculture fastest growing business worldwide especially in developing countries. Fisheries are marine species and required an oceanic environment where fisheries could grow and live naturally. Off-shore aquaculture businesses need a real-time water quality monitoring system. So, aquafarmers could maintain the required environment for a sustainable and profitable business. This work represents an IoT-based realtime health management system designed for aquaculture and considered the most required health metrics for aquaculture. The proposed system used four primary sensors: water level, temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen. Sensors connected with microcontroller Arduino Uno R3 and ESP 8266 wi-fi module are used for data transmission to the IoT source ThingSpeak. The designed system could access online through the web interface and phone App for aquafarmers. The sensor data was accurate, and the system worked as designed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207