MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292596050 · doi:10.1145/3556975

PISCOT: A Pipelined Split-Transaction COTS-Coherent Bus for Multi-Core Real-Time Systems

2022· article· en· W4292596050 on OpenAlexaff
Salah Hessien, Mohamed Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCache coherenceCorrectnessEmbedded systemAvionicsTestbedCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Distributed computingLatency (audio)Real-time computingComputer architectureParallel computingCacheCPU cacheComputer networkAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tasks in modern embedded systems such as automotive and avionics communicate among each other using shared data towards achieving the desired functionality of the whole system. In commodity platforms, cores communicate data through the shared memory hierarchy and correctness is maintained by a cache coherence protocol. Recent works investigated the deployment of coherence protocols in real-time systems and showed significant performance improvements. Nonetheless, we find these works to require modifications to commodity coherence protocols, assume simple in-order pipelines, and most importantly suffer from significant latency delays due to coherence interference along with average performance degradation. In this work, we propose PISCOT : a predictable and coherent bus architecture that (i) provides a considerably tighter bound compared to the state-of-the-art predictable coherent solutions (4× tighter bounds in a quad-core system). (ii) It does so with a negligible performance loss compared to conventional high-performance architecture coherence delays (less than 4% for SPLASH-3 benchmarks). This improves average performance by up to 5× (2.8× on average) compared to its predictable coherence counterpart. Finally, (iii) it achieves that without requiring any modifications to conventional coherence protocols. We show this by integrating PISCOT on top of two protocols with a detailed implementation with complete transient states: MSI and MESI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing SystemsSame topicReal-Time Systems SchedulingFrench-language works237,207