MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sandro Botticelli

2022· reference-entry· en· W4292605221 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2022
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaintingFrescoStyle (visual arts)ArtPoliticsSubject (documents)Art historySubject matterHumanitiesVisual artsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Italian Renaissance artist known as Botticelli was born Alessandro Filipeppi in or about 1445. He began training as a painter in the workshop of Fra Filippo Lippi in the 1460s and carried on his master’s general style and content following Lippi’s death in 1469. Botticelli worked primarily in Florence. From his association with multiple branches of the Medici family and their contemporaries, he has come to represent certain key moments in the history of the city. His work up to the death of Lorenzo di Piero de’ Medici, the de facto ruler of Florence from c. 1469 to 1492, often seems entangled in Medici politics and in the culture of their era. Botticelli’s primary biographer, Giorgio Vasari, claimed that the artist espoused more conservative religious ideals following Lorenzo’s death and with the subsequent rise of Fra Girolamo Savonarola as a political and religious force. His work after 1492 does seem to have changed in both style and content. The degree to which this is due to affiliation with Savonarola or any development of intensely religious feelings is still a subject of scholarly debate. The fact remains that the great majority of his paintings are religious in subject matter. Botticelli began his career as a painter of religious tondi and earned respect and commissions later in life as the master in a workshop producing large altarpieces. Together with Pietro Perugnio, Domenico Ghirlandaio, and Luca Signorelli, he was called to Rome in 1481 to paint frescoes for Pope Sixtus IV on the walls of the newly constructed Sistine Chapel. He was also a very accomplished portraitist. Indeed, his work is notable for the degree to which he blended these seemingly distinct genres by introducing contemporary portraits into religious scenes, as in his Sistine Chapel frescoes and, most notably, the Adoration painted for Guasparre dal Lama, in which Medici family members appear as the three Magi. Nevertheless, Botticelli is perhaps best known and most celebrated for his mythological works, including the Primavera and Birth of Venus, both painted around the year 1482, about which see works cited under the Primavera and Birth of Venus. His late drawings of Dante’s Comedia, left unfinished at his death in 1510, were disparaged by Vasari but instrumental in the rediscovery of the artist in 19th-century England, after centuries of being largely ignored by the general public and scholars alike.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207