MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292606850 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01637

Unraveling the Role of Glycine in K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> Solvent for CO<sub>2</sub> Removal

2022· article· en· W4292606850 on OpenAlexaff
Qingyang Li, Zhenghong Bao, Novruz G. Akhmedov, Benjamin A. Li, Yuhua Duan, Malcolm Xing, Jingxin Wang, Badie I. Morsi, Bingyun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsChemistryBicarbonatePotassium carbonateCarbon dioxideAmino acidHydrolysisSolventCarbonateCarbamateGlycineAbsorption (acoustics)Inorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon dioxide (CO2), a main composition of greenhouse gases, is believed to be responsible for global warming. Both potassium carbonate (K2CO3) and amino acids have been studied for CO2 removal. In this study, for the first time, carbamate formation in the absence of CO2 was discovered in K2CO3 solvents when small amounts of amino acids like glycine were added, and the mechanism of carbamate formation and CO2 absorption in such solvents are detailed and supported the observed fast CO2 absorption in the presence of amino acids. In the mixed solvent of K2CO3 and glycine, bicarbonate and hydroxide were formed from carbonate hydrolysis, and the deprotonated amino acid reacted with bicarbonate to form carbamate in the absence of CO2 and, in the presence of CO2, reacted with CO2 to form carbamate which could subsequently hydrolyze into bicarbonate. As a result, amino acid (even with a small amount) significantly enhanced the CO2 absorption kinetics in the mixed solvents, and a high CO2 loading (0.62 mol CO2/mol K2CO3) was achieved in multiple (e.g., 10) cycles. Such mixed solvents of K2CO3 and amino acid therefore may overcome the limitations of each individual component and may be ideal candidates for CO2 removal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207