Little-Known Pages of Ledokhovskhy Family’s Life. Architect Ignatiy Ledokhovskhy: Creativity and Fate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ignacy-Władysław Ledóchowski worked in Kyiv in the first quarter of the twentieth century. He left the citizens of Kyiv unique buildings in the Art Nouveau style, which has become the decoration of the city for the last few centuries. Based on the analysis of newly discovered sources, the article highlights the little-known pages of the history of the Polish szlachta Ledokhovsky family (Szaława coat of arms) and presents biographies of Kyiv architect Ignatiy Ledokhovsky (1867–1932) and his family; brothers Karol (1871–1931) and Stanislaw (1874–1940). The scientific novelty of this article is highlighted by revealing new information relating to the biography of the architect Ledokhovsky and his family. It was discovered that the future architect Ignacy-Władysław Ledóchowski was born in the village of Strilnyki (pol. Strzelniki), Vinnytsia region, in 13 in old style (25 new style) May 1867, and died on the night of March 2 to 3 1932, in Warsaw, where he was buried. His parents were Kazimir, son of Vladyslav and Jozefa nee Danielevich, Ledokhovsky. The article traces the biographies of his two younger brothers Karol and Stanislav, clarifies the history of the estates of this branch of the Ledokhovsky family in Podillya, in the Right-bank Ukraine. This research on the life and work of the architect Ledokhovski will reveal unknown until now details of his biography, increased materials on his life and work in Ukraine and Poland, as well as some practically unknown members of the Ledokhovsky family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".