MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292615707 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.623

Multiscale tip asymptotics for a deflating hydraulic fracture with leak-off

2022· article· en· W4292615707 on OpenAlexafffund
Anthony Peirce, Emmanuel Detournay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsymptoteFracture (geology)MechanicsFront (military)GeologyPhysicsGeotechnical engineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the construction of the tip asymptotes for a hydraulic fracture deflating in a permeable elastic medium. Specifically, the paper describes the changing nature of the asymptotic fields during the arrest and recession phases following propagation of the fracture after fluid injection has ended. It shows that as the fracture deflates in the arrest phase, the region of dominance of the linear elastic fracture mechanics tip asymptote $w\sim x^{1/2}$ of the fracture aperture $w$ with distance $x$ from the front shrinks to the benefit of an intermediate asymptote $w\sim x^{3/4}$ . Hence only the velocity-independent $3/4$ asymptote is left at the arrest–recession transition. Furthermore, with increasing receding velocity of the front, a linear asymptote $w\sim x$ develops progressively at the fracture tip, with $w\sim x^{3/4}$ again becoming an intermediate asymptote. These universal multiscale asymptotes for the arrest and recession phases are key to determining, in combination with a computational algorithm that can simulate the evolution of a finite fracture, the decaying stress intensity factor during arrest, the time at which the fracture transitions from arrest to recession, and the negative front velocity during recession.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207