Morphological ontogeny of Platynothrus troendelagicus sp. nov. (Acari, Oribatida, Camisiidae) from Norway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The morphological ontogeny of Platynothrus troendelagicus A. et S. Seniczak sp. nov. is described and illustrated. This species was found in two Atlantic raised bogs in Trøndelag, Norway, and based on comparison of cytochrome oxidase I (COI) nucleotide sequences, it also occurs in Ireland and Canada. It is the most similar to P. punctatus (L. Koch, 1879) as adult, but differs from it mainly by having more genital setae, longer seta f2, alveolar seta exp and only one pair of hypostomal setae m. In all juveniles of P. troendelagicus, the bothridial seta and exobothridial seta exa are short, and exp is alveolar. In the larva, seta f1 is setiform, but in the nymphs it is alveolar. Most prodorsal and gastronotal setae are short and smooth, except for longer and barbed f2 and h1 in the larva, and longer and finely barbed f2, and h- and p-series in the nymphs. In all instars, one pair of hypostomal setae m is present, and palp femur has one seta. In the ontogeny of this species, many l setae appear on trochanter III and femora I–III, and l and v setae on tarsi, and the number of setae on femora of deutonymph to adult is diagnostic. Both species differ also by COI nucleotide sequence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".