Les anomalies vasculaires pendant l’enfance : quand traiter les patients et quand les diriger vers une ressource spécialisée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les anomalies vasculaires sont des affections hétérogènes qui touchent les vaisseaux sanguins ou lymphatiques. Les enfants atteints peuvent éprouver de la douleur ou une perte fonctionnelle, présenter une infection ou une coagulopathie ou être confrontés à des difficultés psychologiques. Le diagnostic et la prise en charge exigent souvent une approche interdisciplinaire. Sept cliniques d'anomalies vasculaires au Canada offrent des soins interdisciplinaires. Le présent point de pratique propose une approche thérapeutique des anomalies vasculaires pédiatriques les plus fréquentes (hémangiomes). On y passe en revue les indications de diriger les patients vers une clinique spécialisée, en s'attardant sur les anomalies vasculaires complexes, et notamment les hémangiomes infantiles, qui peuvent provoquer des complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".