MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4292641336 · doi:10.1101/2022.08.20.22278507

LARGE VOLUME SURFACTANT ADMINISTRATION IN PREMATURE INFANTS LESS THAN 35 WEEKS USING MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURFACTANT THERAPY

2022· preprint· en· W4292641336 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yahya Ethawi, A. Hussain, John Minski, Ruben Alvaro

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantMedicineContinuous positive airway pressureGestational ageAnesthesiaSurfactant therapyCatheterBirth weightLow birth weightGestationSurgeryPregnancyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract Large volume surfactant administration in premature infants less than 35 weeks using minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). Background Surfactant in small volume preparations can be successfully administered to premature infants using a narrow-bore vascular catheter inserted into the trachea under direct vision. It was not known if surfactant in large volume preparations could be administered effectively to spontaneously breathing premature infants while maintaining them on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). Objective To evaluate the feasibility of administering a large volume of surfactant (5 ml/kg) in spontaneously breathing premature infants on nCPAP using a vascular catheter. Methods Single-arm interventional trial in two level III nurseries in Canada. Spontaneously breathing premature infants between 24 and 34 weeks’ gestation, born between July 4 th , 2012 and September 5 th , 2012 were eligible for the trial in the first 24 hours of life. A 16-gauge vascular catheter was inserted under direct vision through the vocal cords to administer 5 ml/kg of surfactant while maintaining the infants on nCPAP. Results Twenty-one premature infants were enrolled. The mean gestational age was 29 ± 3 (range 24 to 34 weeks) with mean birth weight of 1474 ± 575 g. Surfactant was successfully administered in 20 infants (95 %). There was a clear effect after surfactant administration with a decrease in oxygen requirement from 0.34 ± 0.111 before the procedure, to 0.26 ± 0.08 after the procedure (p = .001), and a decrease in nCPAP pressure from 7.2 ± 0.5 cm H 2 O before the procedure to 5.9 ± 0.5 after the procedure (p < .0001). The mean duration for surfactant administration was 8.3 ± 3.4 minutes. The procedure was temporarily stopped in three cases due to bradycardia and/or apnea with desaturations that spontaneously recovered without intervention. Coughing and reflux of the surfactant were transiently observed in four cases (19 %). Conclusion It is feasible to administer large volumes of surfactant without interrupting nCPAP via a vascular catheter, to premature infants less than 35 weeks’ gestation. Further trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this method compared to other methods of surfactant administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→