MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292651623 · doi:10.1007/s10915-022-01966-w

Meshfree Semi-Lagrangian Methods for Solving Surface Advection PDEs

2022· article· en· W4292651623 on OpenAlexafffund
Argyrios Petras, Leevan Ling, Steven J. Ruuth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Scientific Computing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsAdvectionSolenoidal vector fieldInviscid flowConvergence (economics)Vector fieldApplied mathematicsDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical analysisField (mathematics)GeometryClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze a class of meshfree semi-Lagrangian methods for solving advection problems on smooth, closed surfaces with solenoidal velocity field. In particular, we prove the existence of an embedding equation whose corresponding semi-Lagrangian methods yield the ones in the literature for solving problems on surfaces. Our analysis allows us to apply standard bulk domain convergence theories to the surface counterparts. In addition, we provide detailed descriptions for implementing the proposed methods to run on point clouds. After verifying the convergence rates against the theory, we show that the proposed method is a robust building block for more complicated problems, such as advection problems with non-solenoidal velocity field, inviscid Burgers' equations and systems of reaction advection diffusion equations for pattern formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Scientific ComputingSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207