MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292651623 · doi:10.1007/s10915-022-01966-w

Meshfree Semi-Lagrangian Methods for Solving Surface Advection PDEs

2022· article· en· W4292651623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Scientific Computing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsAdvectionSolenoidal vector fieldInviscid flowConvergence (economics)Vector fieldApplied mathematicsDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical analysisField (mathematics)GeometryClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze a class of meshfree semi-Lagrangian methods for solving advection problems on smooth, closed surfaces with solenoidal velocity field. In particular, we prove the existence of an embedding equation whose corresponding semi-Lagrangian methods yield the ones in the literature for solving problems on surfaces. Our analysis allows us to apply standard bulk domain convergence theories to the surface counterparts. In addition, we provide detailed descriptions for implementing the proposed methods to run on point clouds. After verifying the convergence rates against the theory, we show that the proposed method is a robust building block for more complicated problems, such as advection problems with non-solenoidal velocity field, inviscid Burgers' equations and systems of reaction advection diffusion equations for pattern formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it