Concurrent management of nasal bone expansion from nasal polyposis (Woakes' disease)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Woakes' disease is the eponymous name for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) leading to thinning and expansion of the nasal pyramid. The endoscopic treatment of the sinus disease, while extensive, is standard practice for the rhinologist. Management of their external nasal deformities, for many, is not. Simultaneous closed rhinoplasty in these patients is straightforward, easy to perform and achieves an excellent esthetic outcome. Methods: Three patients with CRSwNP and notable nasal pyramid expansion are reviewed. All patients had eosinophilic disease, with two having NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). All three patients underwent full house endoscopic sinus surgery from May 2018 to September 2019 along with simultaneous closed rhinoplasty. Two of these patients required only external digital pressure to fracture the nasal bones for gentle Boies elevator repositioning, while the third had osteotomies with minimal force to aid reduction. Results: Postoperatively, patients had excellent nasal airway symptom improvement, and the cosmetic results following rhinoplasty demonstrated normalization of symmetry, profile, and contour of the nose with high-patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Based on our experience, simultaneous rhinoplasty on the thinned nasal bones of Woakes' Disease patients is not only easy to perform, but provides excellent cosmetic and functional results by allowing bone to remodel in the appropriate position, and avoids a second-stage rhinoplasty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".