MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292675852 · doi:10.1038/s41398-022-02083-w

Fluoxetine improves bone microarchitecture and mechanical properties in rodents undergoing chronic mild stress – an animal model of depression

2022· article· en· W4292675852 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond W. Lam, Hee‐Kit Wong, Ramruttun Amit Kumarsing, Anna N. Chua, Roger Ho, Roger S. McIntyre, Cyrus S. H. Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBrain and Cognition Discovery FoundationUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluoxetineSerotonin reuptake inhibitorAntidepressantBone mineralMedicinePlaceboInternal medicineSerotoninDepression (economics)EndocrinologyDentistryOsteoporosisPathologyHippocampus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depression is one of the most prevalent mental disorders associated with reductions in bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Fluoxetine is a highly prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in the treatment of depression and is reported to be a risk factor for fractures. The present study examined the effect of fluoxetine on bone microarchitecture and the mechanical properties under chronic mild stress (CMS), a rodent model of depression. Thirty-one 6-9 week-old rats were allocated to 4 groups: 1) CMS + fluoxetine group (n = 10), 2) fluoxetine-only group (n = 5), 3) CMS + placebo group (n = 10) and 4) control group (no CMS and treatment) (n = 6). After 16 weeks, bone microarchitecture of the distal femur was analyzed by µCT. Mechanical properties were assessed by the three-point bending test, and antidepressant efficacy was determined by sucrose preference and forced swimming tests. Significant correlations were found between volume of sucrose intake and bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) (p = 0.019) and elastic absorption energy (p = 0.001) in the fluoxetine only group. The fluoxetine-only group showed significantly higher in the second moment of area in y-direction (p = 0.0298), horizontal outer diameter (mm) (p = 0.0488) and average midshaft thickness (mm) (p = 0.00047) than control group. Comparing with the control group, there was a significant reduction in trabecular number (Tb.N) in the CMS + fluoxetine group (p = 0.026) but not the fluoxetine-only group (p > 0.05). Significant increases in trabecular separation were observed in the metaphysis of CMS + placebo (p = 0.003) and CMS + fluoxetine (p = 0.004) groups when compared to the control group but not in the fluoxetine-only group (p > 0.05). During the three-point bending test, the fluoxetine-only group demonstrated significantly higher structural strength than controls (p = 0.04). Micro computed tomography (µCT) slices showed loss of trabecular bone in the metaphysis region of the CMS + fluoxetine and CMS + placebo groups but not the fluoxetine-only and control groups. In an animal model of depression, the adverse effect on the bone microarchitecture was caused by CMS but not by fluoxetine. Without exposure to CMS, fluoxetine significantly increased the cross-sectional area, trabecular bone area, structural strength and osteoblasts / bone area as compared to control condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PsychiatrySame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207