MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292676954 · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213086

Self-assembled calcium pyrophosphate nanostructures for targeted molecular delivery

2022· article· en· W4292676954 on OpenAlexaff
D. C. Bassett, Thomas E. Robinson, Reghan J. Hill, Liam M. Grover, Jake E. Barralet

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomaterials Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrophosphateDrug deliveryNanotechnologyNanostructureMicrosphereMaterials scienceCrystallizationCatalysisChemical engineeringSalt (chemistry)ChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanostructured, inorganic microspheres have many industrial applications, including catalysis, electronics, and particularly drug delivery, with several advantages over their organic counterparts. However, many current production methods require high energy input, use of harmful chemicals, and extensive processing. Here, the self-assembly of calcium pyrophosphate into nanofibre microspheres is reported. This process takes place at ambient temperature, with no energy input, and only salt water as a by-product. The formation of these materials is examined, as is the formation of nanotubes when the system is agitated, from initial precipitate to crystallisation. A mechanism of formation is proposed, whereby the nanofibre intermediates are formed as the system moves from kinetically favoured spheres to thermodynamically stable plates, with a corresponding increase in aspect ratio. The functionality of the nanofibre microspheres as targeted enteric drug delivery vehicles is then demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, showing that the microspheres can pass through the stomach while protecting the activity of a model protein, then release their payload in intestinal conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomaterials AdvancesSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207