Lipids and the cancer stemness regulatory system in acute myeloid leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease of impaired myeloid differentiation and a caricature of normal hematopoiesis. Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) are responsible for long-term clonal propagation in AML just as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) sustain lifelong hematopoiesis. LSCs are often resistant to standard chemotherapy and are responsible for clinical relapse. Although AML is highly heterogeneous, determinants of stemness are prognostic for AML patient survival and can predict AML drug sensitivity. Therefore, one way to overcome challenges preventing efficacious treatment outcomes is to target LSC stemness. Metabolomic and lipidomic studies of serum and cells from AML patients are emerging to complement genomic, transcriptomic, epigenetic, and proteomic data sets to characterize and stratify AML. Recent studies have shown the value of fractionating LSCs versus blasts when characterizing metabolic pathways and implicate the importance of lipid balance to LSCs function. As more extensive metabolic studies coupled to functional in vivo assays are conducted on highly purified HSCs, bulk AML, and LSCs, the similarities and differences in lipid homeostasis in stem-like versus more mature AML subtypes as well as from normal HSCs are emerging. Here, we discuss the latest findings from studies of lipid function in LSCs, with a focus on sphingolipids (SLs) as stemness/lineage fate mediators in AML, and the balance of fatty acid anabolism and catabolism fueling metabolic flexibility and drug resistance in AML. We also discuss how designing successful strategies to target lipid vulnerabilities and improve AML patient survival should take into consideration the hierarchical nature of AML.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".