MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292755723 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111238

Characterization of stem-cell-derived islets during differentiation and after implantation

2022· review· en· W4292755723 on OpenAlexafffund
Nerea Cuesta‐Gomez, Kevin Verhoeff, Ila Tewari Jasra, Rena Pawlick, Nidheesh Dadheech, A. M. James Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBreakthrough T1D CanadaAlberta Diabetes FoundationCanada Research ChairsJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Canada
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellEmbryonic stem cellIsletTransplantationStem cellBiologyEndocrine systemEnteroendocrine cellDirected differentiationCellular differentiationCell biologyCellBioinformaticsInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusMedicineEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recapitulation of embryonic pancreatic development has enabled development of methods for in vitro islet cell differentiation using human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), which have the potential to cure diabetes. Advanced methods for optimal generation of stem-cell-derived islets (SC-islets) has enabled successful diabetes reversal in rodents and shown promising early clinical trial outcomes. The main impediment for use of SC-islets is concern about safety because of off-target growth resulting from contaminated residual cells. In this review, we summarize the different endocrine and non-endocrine cell populations that have been described to emerge throughout β cell differentiation and after transplantation. We discuss the most recent approaches to enrich endocrine populations and remove off-target cells. Finally, we discuss the critical quality control and release criteria testing that we anticipate will be required prior to transplantation to ensure product safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207