MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292794776 · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00316

Conjugate Adder Net (CAddNet) - a Space-Efficient Approximate CNN

2022· article· en· W4292794776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdderMultiplication (music)Computer scienceReduction (mathematics)Net (polyhedron)ArithmeticArtificial neural networkConjugateAlgorithmConjugate gradient methodMathematicsArtificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AdderNet was recently developed as a way to implement deep neural networks without needing multiplication operations to combine weights and inputs. Instead, absolute values of the difference between weights and inputs are used, greatly reducing the gate-level implementation complexity. Training of AdderNets is challenging, however, and the loss curves during training tend to fluctuate significantly. In this paper we propose the Conjugate Adder Network, or CAddNet, which uses the difference between the absolute values of conjugate pairs of inputs and the weights. We show that this can be implemented simply via a single minimum operation, resulting in a roughly 50% reduction in logic gate complexity as compared with AdderNets. The CAddNet method also stabilizes training as compared with AdderNets, yielding training curves similar to standard CNNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it