MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292852464 · doi:10.7759/cureus.28323

MACE in the Race: A Canadian Perspective on Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) During Running

2022· editorial· en· W4292852464 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohammed Abrahim

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaceMedicineContemplationPerspective (graphical)Race (biology)Adverse effectMedical emergencyPsychiatryInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent tragic deaths of two fit and healthy Canadian physicians during running have shocked the whole Canadian medical community. In order to prevent such loss of precious human lives, the paradox of dying during a life-prolonging activity begets further contemplation and investigation on whether we have been missing something in assessing the risk of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) in fit individuals during long-distance running. Additionally, knowing the potential, yet the rare fatal risk of running, physicians are obliged to disclose that fatal risk while prescribing exercise to their patients according to the Supreme Court of Canada Ruling. Further research is urgently needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207