MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292857740 · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2022.06.007

Priapism or Prolonged Erection: Is 4 – 6 Hours of Cavernous Ischemia the Time Point of Irreversible Tissue Injury?

2022· review· en· W4292857740 on OpenAlexaff
Snir Dekalo, Noah Stern, Gregory A. Broderick, Gerald Brock

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine Reviews · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa Fertility CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPriapismMedicineIschemiaAnesthesiaUrologyCardiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic priapism remains a significant cause of morbidity among men. To date, the precise time when penile ischemia results in permanent, non-reversible cavernosal smooth muscle injury, compromising subsequent erectile integrity, remains ill-defined. OBJECTIVES: To review the medical literature pertaining to ischemic priapism, focusing on factors that predict the exact timeline of irreversible cavernous tissue injury. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Our search included both publications on animal models and retrospective clinical series through January 2022. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they contained original data regarding nonreversible tissue injury on histology and/or provided a timeline of erectile function loss or preservation and had full text available in English. RESULTS: Innovative studies in the 1990s using invitro models with strips of rabbit, rat, canine and monkey corpus cavernosal tissue demonstrated that anoxia eliminated spontaneous contractile activity and reduced tissue responsiveness to electrical field stimulation or pharmacological agents. The same models demonstrated that the inhibitory effects of field stimulated relaxation, were mediated by nitric oxide. Subsequent studies using similar models demonstrated that exposure of corpus cavernosum smooth muscle to an acidotic environment impairs its ability to contract. A pH of 6.9 was chosen for these experiments based on a case series of men with priapism, in whom a mean pH of 6.9 was measured in corporal blood after 4-6 hours of priapism. Invivo animal studies demonstrated that after erection periods of 6-8 hours, microscopy shows sporadic endothelial defects but otherwise normal cavernous smooth muscle. In these studies, greater durations of ischemic priapism were shown to result in more pronounced ultrastructural changes and presumably irreversibility. In studies involving human corporal tissues, samples were obtained from men who had experienced priapism for at least 12 hours. Overall, erectile function outcome data is deficient in priapism reporting, especially within treatment windows less than 6 hours. Some reports on ischemic priapism have documented good erectile function outcomes with reversal by 12 hours. CONCLUSION: Based on our extensive review of animal models and clinical reports, we found that many clinical papers rely on the same small set of animal studies to suggest the time point of irreversible ischemic damage at 4-6 hours. Our review suggests an equal number of retrospective clinical studies demonstrate that ischemic priapism reversed within 6-12 hours may preserve erectile function in many patients. Dekalo S, Stern N, Broderick GA, et al. Priapism or Prolonged Erection: Is 4 - 6 Hours of Cavernous Ischemia the Time Point of Irreversible Tissue Injury? Sex Med Rev 2022;10:660-668.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual Medicine ReviewsSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207