MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Book Reviews Comptes rendus

2003· article· en· W4292936502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Public Administration · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyPolitical scienceGlobalizationState (computer science)Public administrationCorporate governanceSociologyManagementLawComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uncle Sam and Us: Globalization, Neoconservatism, and the Canadian State By Stephen Clarkson. Building Consensus for a Sustainable Future: Putting Principles into Practice By Gerald Cormick, Norman Dale, Paul Emond, S. Glenn SiCurdsonand Barry D. Stuart. The Trouble with Democracy: A Citizen Speaks Out By William D. Gairdner. State Work: Public Administratfon and Mass Intellectuality By Stefano Harney. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research By Laurence E. Lynn, Jr., Carolyn J. Heinrich and Carolyn J. Hill. Agenda‐Setting Dynamics in Canada By Stuart N. Soroka.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4400.396

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Public AdministrationSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207