MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292951298 · doi:10.3407/rpn.v5i2.6921

Evaluación del potencial larvicida en el extracto total en etanol y metanol del cuerpo fructífero de Chlorophyllum molybdites sobre Aedes aegypti.

2022· article· es· W4292951298 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jaider José Mercado Agamez, Rita Luz Márquez Viscaíno, David José Estrada Reyes

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Productos Naturales · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPsidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedes aegyptiHumanitiesBiologyArtBotanyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el presente estudio se evaluó la actividad larvicida de extractos obtenidos a partir del cuerpo fructífero de Chlorophyllum molybdites, colectados en el municipio de Galeras en el departamento de Sucre sobre larvas de III estadio de Aedes aegypti, se utilizaron extractos etanólico y metanólico a concentraciones de 10, 100, 500, 1000 y 2000 µg/mL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Productos NaturalesSame topicPsidium guajava Extracts and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207