The effect of the website attributes on online impulse buying: An empirical investigation of utilitarian and hedonic motivations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Web based shopping has been the quickest developing channel of looking for over 10 years with deals developing at a yearly pace of 25%. One review connected properties of a site to drive purchasing conduct. Given the quick development of web-based shopping and the qualities of web-based shopping that energizes drive purchasing (for example open every minute of every day), drive purchasing on the web is probably going to be pervasive. Accordingly, this study plans to investigate the effects of site credits and persuasive variables on internet-based motivation purchasing. A self-directed poll was utilized to gather information for this review. The 400 respondents, in line with the required sample size, were people who have online buying experience in Thailand. The data analysis method is Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The results of the study revealed that influence of web site attributes has a positive relationship with motivation factors. Moreover, motivation factors have a positive relationship with online impulse buying. Additionally, two components of motivation factors which are utilitarian and hedonic motivations, mediate the relationship between web site attributes and online impulse buying.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it