MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292970091 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3201489

SatViT: Pretraining Transformers for Earth Observation

2022· article· en· W4292970091 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Fuller, Koreen Millard, James R. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformerArtificial intelligenceTraining setMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)VoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the enormous success of the ’pre-training and fine-tuning’ paradigm, widespread across machine learning, it has yet to pervade remote sensing (RS). To help rectify this, we pre-train a vision transformer (ViT) on 1.3 million satellite-derived RS images. We pre-train SatViT using a state-of-the-art self-supervised learning algorithm called masked autoencoding (MAE), which learns general representations by reconstructing held-out image patches. Crucially, this approach does not require annotated data, allowing us to pre-train on unlabeled images acquired from Sentinel-1 & 2. After fine-tuning, SatViT outperforms state-of-the-art ImageNet and RS-specific pre-trained models on both of our downstream tasks. We further improve overall accuracy (by 3.2% and 0.21%) by continuing to pre-train SatViT—still using MAE—on the unlabelled target datasets. Most importantly, we release our code, pre-trained model weights, and tutorials aimed at helping researchers fine-tune our models. (https://github.com/antofuller/SatViT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207