MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292975821 · doi:10.1109/icdh55609.2022.00012

Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI Images Using A Modified U-Net Model

2022· article· en· W4292975821 on OpenAlexaff
Thong Vo, Pranjal Dave, Gaurav Bajpai, Rasha Kashef, Naimul Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiceSegmentationRobustness (evolution)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceDeep learningImage segmentationMedical imagingPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain tumor segmentation is an essential process to diagnose and monitor the development of cancerous cells in the brain. Conventional segmentation methods rely on experts who manually label radiology individual images. Meanwhile, deep learning has shown tremendous progress in medical image seg-mentation where minor details are difficult to differentiate. In the paper, we propose a deep learning architecture to automatically segment such radiology images, named UVR-Net model. The proposed architecture is based on the popular U-Net framework which demonstrated its robustness and capabilities in the medical imaging field. Experimental results show that the proposed UVR-Net achieves a Dice score of 0.76, and IOU scores 0.89 compared to the traditional vanilla U-Net architecture by a factor of 11% in terms of Dice score. In addition, we also perform sensitivity analysis for critical parameters and loss functions in the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207