Appropriation des enjeux environnementaux des Sites naturels protégés et Usages Récréatifs (ASUR) : dans les estuaires de la Gironde (France) et du Saint-Laurent (Québec)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
/ L'objectif du projet ASUR est de comprendre la manière dont les usagers des estuaires de la Gironde (France) et du Saint-Laurent (Québec) s'approprient les enjeux environnementaux et les mesures de gestion associés aux sites naturels qu'ils fréquentent. Il s'agit d'identifier les facteurs qui entrent en jeu dans ce processus d'appropriation. Pour ce, trois séries d'hypothèses sont posées : celles d'une appropriation différenciée selon la sensibilité écologique des usagers, selon les types d'usages récréatifs et enfin selon les politiques de préservation mises en oe½uvre. La confrontation et la validation de ces hypothèses issues de corpus théoriques divergents nécessitent la mise en ½oeuvre d'enquêtes qualitatives et quantitatives et d'une analyse comparée. Celle-ci s'appuiera donc sur les exemples contrastés de ces estuaires et des politiques de préservation dont ils font l'objet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".