Water Quality Assessment of Keelung Port
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aimed to conduct water quality assessment in the port area covered by the Keelung Port in Keelung City, Taiwan and to determine if spatial variability and tidal variability affect the water quality parameters. This research addresses the gap on the limited work published on the pollutants present and dissolved in the water. Relatively little attention has been given to the study area, where different shipping operations may have considerable impacts on the water quality in the port environment. Based on the standards set by the Taiwan International Ports Corporation (TIPC), pH and DO are within the permissible values. DO was markedly lower during high tide, which was consistent with the findings of other researchers. The concentration of mercury, arsenic, and chromium were all below the detection limits of the measuring equipment used in the research. Water quality is significantly affected by the location of sampling area, whereas the inner port area showed relatively higher level of contamination compared with the measurements taken at the outer port area. Based on the independent samples Mann-Whitney U test conducted, tidal condition does not significantly affect the distribution of measurements of the water quality parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".