MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293009636 · doi:10.3390/designs6050069

Innovative Overview of SWRC Application in Modeling Geotechnical Engineering Problems

2022· article· en· W4293009636 on OpenAlexaff
Kennedy C. Onyelowe, Farid Fazel Mojtahedi, Sadra Azizi, Hisham A. Mahdi, Evangelin Ramani Sujatha, Ahmed M. Ebid, Ali Golaghaei Darzi, Aneke Frank Ikechukwu

Bibliographic record

VenueDesigns · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringDegree of saturationEarthworksSuctionCivil engineeringSoil waterWater contentSettlement (finance)Saturation (graph theory)Engineering geologySoil mechanicsEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMathematicsComputer scienceSoil scienceGeologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The soil water retention curve (SWRC) or soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC) is a fundamental feature of unsaturated soil that simply shows the relationship between soil suction and water content (in terms of the degree of saturation and volumetric or gravimetric water content). In this study, the applications of the SWRC or SWCC have been extensively reviewed, taking about 403 previously published research studies into consideration. This was achieved on the basis of classification-based problems and application-based problems, which solve the widest array of geotechnical engineering problems relevant to and correlating with SWRC geo-structural behavior. At the end of the exercises, the SWRC geo-structural problem-solving scope, as covered in the theoretical framework, showed that soil type, soil parameter, measuring test, predictive technique, slope stability, bearing capacity, settlement, and seepage-based problems have been efficiently solved by proffering constitutive and artificial intelligence solutions to earthwork infrastructure; and identified matric suction as the most influential parameter. Finally, a summary of these research findings and key challenges and opportunities for future tentative research topics is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesignsSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207