Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction of Public-School Teachers in Distance Education: A Quantitative Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study focused onOccupational Stress and Job Satisfaction of Public-School Teachers in Distance Education using the descriptive correlational technique. Furthermore, the study will look into whether there was a link between the degree of occupational stress, and levels of job satisfaction among the public-school teachers. The study was conducted in the province of Cebu. The respondents of the study are the 90 teachers selected using the systematic Random sampling method. Moreover, the research instrument used was the 36-item Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) (Schutz and. Long, 1988) and the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ-short form) to measure intrinsic and extrinsic job factors of employees. The study yielded that teachers are experiencing some type of stress in the workplace which may be due to the added responsibilities in distance learning. Likewise, despite the stress and the additional obligations brought on by the epidemic, teachers were satisfied with their jobs. In addition, the study found a significant relationship between the Level of Occupational Stress and the Level of Job Satisfaction of Teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".