Multichannel intelligent fault diagnosis of hoisting system using differential search algorithm‐variational mode decomposition and improved deep convolutional neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, the feature extraction method of multichannel acoustic emission (AE) signal provides a solid research foundation for digital and intelligent fault diagnosis of the hoisting system. More specifically, AE signal collected from the hoisting system is generally characterized by nonlinear and non-stationary, thus making the traditional intelligent fault diagnosis methods cannot accurately extract the inherent fault features. To alleviate this problem and improve the accuracy of multichannel fault diagnosis, a new fault diagnosis method for hoisting system based on differential search algorithm-variational mode decomposition (DSA-VMD) and improved deep convolutional neural network (IDCNN) is proposed in this paper. Specifically, the proposed DSA-VMD and IDCNN method is divided into two main components: (i) the inside parameters (K, a) of VMD is optimized to effectively extract the multichannel AE fault feature via DSA-VMD and (ii) the extracted multichannel fault components are fed into the designed IDCNN algorithm to accomplish fault identification automatically. Experimental results from the hoisting system demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Additionally, the superiority of the proposed approach has also been verified in extracting fault information and fault identification compared to the other multichannel fault diagnosis methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".