Cationic lignin polymers as flocculants for municipal wastewater
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this research, two lignin‐[2‐(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride (METAC) polymers were generated and assessed for their efficiency in treating municipally produced wastewater. The removals of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and turbidity were 47.5% and 71.2%, respectively, for the singular flocculation system at the dosage of 40–70 mg/L. For the dual coagulation/flocculation system, the polymer with a higher charge density (AM2) achieved higher COD and turbidity removals than the polymer with a lower charge density (AM1). To achieve the same organic removal from the wastewater, the alum use could be reduced from 150 mg/L in the single alum use to 35 mg/L in the dual system when used along with 65 mg/L of AM2. In both systems, lignin‐METAC polymers exhibited better performance than the flocculant used at a local wastewater treatment plant. Lignin‐METAC polymers could be used as bio‐based flocculants for the replacement of petroleum‐based flocculants and inorganic coagulants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it